There are some conditions under which a novelist could reasonably expect some government suport. In general terms, if the writer has already proved that he or she can write well, and if the stories produced are (stimulating) and interesting, then I consider that some financial help might be given. Language quality is difficult to define, but if the writing shows, for example, good grammar, a wide vocabulary, and elegance and imagination, then I can see a valid reason for (assisting) an author to spend some time free from money problems. Such a writing needs to be encouraged. the entertainment value of a book would be also a factor in deciding whether to provide assistance to an author. Further (consideration) would include social and educational values expressed in the author's work. However, if the ideas were socially (irresponsible), or if the stories contain unnecessary violence or pornography for its own sake, then I would not want to see the author sponsored to write stories which do not benefit society. Other exceptions are the many writers of good books who do not require (financial) help. Books which proved to be extremely popular, such as the Harry Potter stories, clearly need no (subsidy) at all because the authors have become rich through their writing. Views on what good quality writing means will vary widely, and so if any (author) is to be given money for writing, then the decision would have to be made by a (committee) or panel of judge. An individual opinion would certainly cause disagreement among the reading public.
